Sexual Robots: The Social-Relational Approach and the Concept of Subjective Reference

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we propose the notion of “subjective reference” as a conceptual tool that explains how and why human-robot sexual interactions could reframe users approach to human-human sexual interactions. First, we introduce the current debate about Sexual Robotics, situated in the wider discussion about Social Robots, stating the urgency of a regulative framework. We underline the importance of a social-relational approach, mostly concerned about Social Robots impact in human social structures. Then, we point out the absence of a precise framework conceptualizing why Social Robots, and Sexual Robots in particular, may modify users’ sociality and relationality. Within a psychological framework, we propose to consider Sexual Robots as “subjective references”, namely objects symbolically referring to human subjects: we claim that, for the user experience, every action performed upon a Sexual Robot is symbolically directed toward a human subject, including degrading and violent practices. This shifting mechanism may transfer the user relational setting from human-robot interactions to human-human interactions.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Humans, Animals, and Robots.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2011 - International Journal of Social Robotics 3 (2):197-204.
Designing Virtuous Sex Robots.Anco Peeters & Pim Haselager - 2019 - International Journal of Social Robotics:1-12.
Companion robots: the hallucinatory danger of human-robot interactions.Piercosma Bisconti & Daniele Nardi - 2018 - In AIES '18: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. pp. 17-22.
Modeling the acceptance of socially interactive robotics: Social presence in human–robot interaction.Dong-Hee Shin & Hyungseung Choo - 2011 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 12 (3):430-460.
Why Collaborative Robots Must Be Social (and even Emotional) Actors.Kerstin Fischer - 2019 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 23 (3):270-289.
On the Very Idea of Sex with Robots.Mark Migotti & Nicole Wyatt - 2018 - In John Danaher & Neil McArthur (eds.), Robot Sex: Social Implications and Ethical. MIT. pp. 15-27.
Personal Robots, Appearance, and Human Good.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2009 - International Journal of Social Robotics 1 (3):217-221.
Can we trust robots?Mark Coeckelbergh - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):53-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-13

Downloads
963 (#13,530)

6 months
122 (#27,487)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Piercosma Bisconti
Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant'Anna

References found in this work

The other question: can and should robots have rights?David J. Gunkel - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (2):87-99.
Robots, rape, and representation.Robert Sparrow - 2017 - International Journal of Social Robotics 9 (4):465-477.

View all 8 references / Add more references