Is superluminal travel a theoretical possibility?

Foundations of Physics 14 (4):333-340 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The theory of relativity forbids the superluminal travel of ordinary matter. However, it is possible to amend the theory of relativity and to develop a theory permitting superluminal travel. The acceptability of the features needed for superluminal travel is discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Superluminal Signals and the Resolution of the Causal Paradox.F. Selleri - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (3):443-463.
On going backward in time.John Earman - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (3):211-222.
Troubles with time travel.William Grey - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (1):55-70.
Reconciling causality with superluminal travel.George H. Duffey - 1980 - Foundations of Physics 10 (11-12):959-964.
Time Travel and Time Machines.Douglas Kutach - 2013 - In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Chichester, UK: Blackwell. pp. 301–314.
Time travel and time machines.Chris Smeenk & Christian Wuthrich - 2011 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 577-630.
“Time Travel‘ in the Godel Universe.David B. Malament - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:91 - 100.
The case for time travel.Phil Dowe - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (3):441-451.
The Time Machine in Our Mind.Kurt Stocker - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (3):385-420.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
40 (#378,975)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Do tachyons produce an unacceptable gravitational field?N. T. Bishop - 1989 - Foundations of Physics 19 (5):619-624.
Is superluminal travel a theoretical possibility? II.N. T. Bishop - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (5):571-574.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The logic of special relativity.S. J. Prokhovnik - 1967 - London,: Cambridge University Press.
How to recover causality in special relativity for tachyons.Erasmo Recami - 1978 - Foundations of Physics 8 (5-6):329-340.
Time in statistical physics and special relativity.P. T. Landsberg - 1972 - In J. T. Fraser, F. C. Haber & G. H. Mueller (eds.), The Study of Time. Springer Verlag. pp. 59--109.
Comments on “Farewell to tachyons?”.G. D. Maccarrone & E. Recami - 1980 - Foundations of Physics 10 (11-12):949-957.
Tachyons without paradoxes.Steven C. Barrowes - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (7-8):617-627.

View all 8 references / Add more references