BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-18 (2021)
AbstractBackground Best interests is a ubiquitous principle in medical policy and practice, informing the treatment of both children and adults. Yet theory underlying the concept of best interests is unclear and rarely articulated. This paper examines bioethical literature for theoretical accounts of best interests to gain a better sense of the meanings and underlying philosophy that structure understandings. Methods A scoping review of was undertaken. Following a literature search, 57 sources were selected and analysed using the thematic method. Results Three themes emerged. The first placed best interests within the structure of wider theory, noting relationships with consequentialism, deontology, prudential value theory, rights and political philosophy. The second mapped a typology of processes of decision-making, among which best interests was ambiguously positioned. It further indicated factors that informed best interests decision-making, primarily preferences, dignity and quality of life. The final theme considered best interests from a relational perspective. Conclusions Characterisation of best interests as strictly paternalist and consequentialist is questionable: while accounts often suggested a consequentialist basis for best interests, arguments appeared philosophically weak. Deontological accounts, found in law and Kantianism, and theories of political liberalism influenced accounts of best interests, with accounts often associating best interests with negative patient preferences. There was much more emphasis on negative interests than positive interests. Besides preference, factors like dignity and quality of life were held to inform best interests decisions, but generally were weakly defined. To the extent that preferences were unable to inform decision making, decisions were either made by proxy authority or by an intersubjective process of diffuse authority. Differing approaches reflect bifurcations in liberal philosophy between new liberalism and neo-liberalism. Although neither account of authority appears dominant, bias to negative interests suggests that bioethical debate tends to reflect the widespread ascendancy of neo-liberalism. This attitude was underscored by the way relational accounts converged on private familial authority. The visible connections to theory suggest that best interests is underpinned by socio-political trends that may set up frictions with practice. How practice negotiates these frictions remains a key question.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Citations of this work
Between Multiple Identities and Values: Professionals’ Identity Conflicts in Ethically Charged Situations.Lara Carminati & YingFei Gao Héliot - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Similar books and articles
Family Interests and Medical Decisions for Children.Paul Baines - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (8):599-607.
Best Interests, Public Interest, and the Power of the Medical Profession.John Coggon - 2008 - Health Care Analysis 16 (3):219-232.
Deciding Together? Best Interests and Shared Decision-Making in Paediatric Intensive Care.Giles Birchley - 2014 - Health Care Analysis 22 (3):203-222.
The Best Interests of Persistently Vegetative Patients: To Die Rather That to Live?Tak Kwong Chan & George Lim Tipoe - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (3):202-204.
Stakeholder Theory and Managerial Decision-Making: Constraints and Implications of Balancing Stakeholder Interests.Scott J. Reynolds, Frank C. Schultz & David R. Hekman - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 64 (3):285-301.
Interests and Neonates: There is More to the Story Than We Explicitly Acknowledge.D. Micah Hester - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):357-372.
Rejecting the Baby Doe Rules and Defending a "Negative" Analysis of the Best Interests Standard.Loretta Kopelman - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):331 – 352.
Clinical Ethics: Best Interests, Dementia and the Mental Capacity Act.T. Hope, A. Slowther & J. Eccles - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (12):733-738.
The Concept of Futility in Health Care Decision Making.Susan Bailey - 2004 - Nursing Ethics 11 (1):77-83.
Decision Making in Acute Care: A Practical Framework Supporting the 'Best Interests' Principle.Susan Bailey - 2006 - Nursing Ethics 13 (3):284-291.
Best Interests, Dementia, and End of Life Decision-Making: The Case of Mrs S.Rosalind McDougall - 2005 - Monash Bioethics Review 24 (3):36-46.
Against Etiological Function Accounts of Interests.Katie McShane - 2019 - Synthese 198 (4):3499-3517.
Familiar Interests and Strange Analogies: Baergen and Woodhouse on Extra-Familial Interests.James Nelson - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 24:338-342.