The suspended aesthetic: Slavoj žižek on eastern european film

Studies in East European Thought 56 (4):357-382 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Slavoj iek's writings on Krzysztof Kies´lowski and Andrej Tarkovskij represent direct challenges to the Central and Eastern European tradition of spiritual art and to dominant aesthetic concepts as such. He refuses to separate the solemn films of Kies´lowski and Tarkovskij from popular culture and stresses their import as ethical statements by their directors. Despite this ethical emphasis, iek makes an important contribution to philosophical aesthetics. He implicitly defines art as a suspension of reality which reveals time in its fragility and potentiality. Defining iek's aesthetics in terms of suspension helps to explain his partiality for Kies´lowski and Tarkovskij and bears comparison to the Russian tradition of philosophical aesthetics, in particular Aleksej Losev and Alexander Bakshy.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Slavoj Žižek.Tony Myers - 2003 - New York: Routledge.
When is Film Art?Jesse Prinz - 2011 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 258 (4):473-485.
Slavoj žižek and the real subject of politics.R. Moolenaar - 2004 - Studies in East European Thought 56 (4):259-297.
What do we see in film?Robert Hopkins - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):149–159.
Die Wüste des Realen: Slavoj žižek und der deutsche Idealismus.Sigrun Bielfeldt - 2004 - Studies in East European Thought 56 (4):335-356.


Added to PP

100 (#174,401)

6 months
2 (#1,203,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references