Genomics, Society and Policy 4 (2):1-10 (2008)

Abstract
In bioethics there is an ongoing debate about the ethical case for human enhancement through new biomedical technologies. In this debate there are both supporters and opponents of human enhancement technologies such as genetic improvements of cognitive abilities . The supporters argue that human enhancement will lead to healthier and therefore better lives, meaning that any delays to the introduction of such technologies is problematic. In contrast, the opponents argue that new technologies will not solve problems such as inequality and social justice. In order to overcome opposition to human enhancement, Bostrom and Ord have outlined a test to evaluate ethical arguments for “status quo bias” or what they call “intuitive judgements” in the assessment of human enhancement. This article is a response to their paper in which I raise a number of problems with their position, particularly with their “status quo bias” test and the incorporation of economistic thinking into their ethical arguments
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1186/1746-5354-4-2-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
A Brief History of Neoliberalism.David Harvey - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Responsibility.J. Glover - 1973 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 35 (1):211-213.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Thinking Across Species—a Critical Bioethics Approach to Enhancement.Richard Twine - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):509-523.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Should We Enhance Animals?S. Chan - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):678-683.
Is Human Enhancement Also a Personal Matter?Vincent Menuz, Thierry Hurlimann & Béatrice Godard - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):161-177.
Bioconservatism, Bioliberalism, and Repugnance.Rebecca Roache & Steve Clarke - 2009 - Monash Bioethics Review 28 (1):04.1-04.21.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
5 ( #1,207,394 of 2,518,151 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,151 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes