British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (2):399 – 408 (1995)
Abstract |
The paper seeks to refute Skorupski's claim in _English-Language Philosophy 1750-1945
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1080/09608789508570923 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kant and Naturalism Reconsidered.John H. Zammito - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (5):532 – 558.
Hegel, McDowell, and Recent Defenses of Kant.Sally Sedgwick - 2000 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 31 (3):229-247.
Similar books and articles
What Divides Us Today.Arthur E. Falk - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:45-49.
Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative.Jerome Arthur Stone - 2008 - State University of New York Press.
Kant's "Naturalistic" History of Mankind? Some Reservations.John Zammito - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (1):29-62.
Comments on Graham Bird’s The Revolutionary Kant.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2011 - Kantian Review 16 (2):1-11.
Kant and Naturalism Reconsidered.John H. Zammito - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (5):532 – 558.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-02-01
Total views
77 ( #150,363 of 2,507,811 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,820 of 2,507,811 )
2009-02-01
Total views
77 ( #150,363 of 2,507,811 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,820 of 2,507,811 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads