Theory and Decision 84 (1):11-27 (2018)
AbstractThird generation prospect theory is a theory of choices and of judgments of highest buying and lowest selling prices of risky prospects, i.e., of willingness to pay and willingness to accept. The gap between WTP and WTA is sometimes called the “endowment effect” and was previously called the “point of view” effect. Third generation prospect theory combines cumulative prospect theory for risky prospects with the theory that judged values are based on the integration of price paid or price received with the consequences of gambles. In TGPT, the discrepancy between WTP and WTA is due to loss aversion-losses have greater absolute utility than gains of the same value. TGPT was developed independently of similar developments by Birnbaum and Zimmermann :145–187, 1998) and Luce. This paper reviews theoretical and empirical findings, to show that TGPT fails as a descriptive model of both choices and judgments. Evidence refutes three implications of TGPT, but they are consistent with configural weight models in which loss aversion is not needed to describe the results. In the configural weight models, buyers place greater weight on lower consequences, attributes or estimates of value compared to sellers, who place greater configural weight on higher aspects of an object or prospect.
Similar books and articles
The Role of Evaluation-Driven Rejection in the Successful Exploration of a Conceptual Space of Stories.Carlos León & Pablo Gervás - 2010 - Minds and Machines 20 (4):615-634.
The Instrumentalist Abduction Task and the Nature of Empirical Counterexamples: Reply to Atocha Aliseda.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):190-192.
Another Start for Abduction Aiming at Empirical Progress: Reply to Joke Meheus.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):218-220.
Toward a Geometrical Theory of Truth Approximation: Reply to Thomas Mormann.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):455-457.
Abduction Aiming at Empirical Progress or Even Truth Approximation Leading to a Challenge for Computational Modelling.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (3):307-323.
Do Financial Professionals Behave According to Prospect Theory? An Experimental Study.Mohammed Abdellaoui, Han Bleichrodt & Hilda Kammoun - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):411-429.
Applications of Prospect Theory to Political Science.Jack S. Levy - 2003 - Synthese 135 (2):215 - 241.
Lacunae, Empirical Progress and Semantic Tableaux.Atocha Aliseda - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):169-189.
Reevaluating Evidence on Myopic Loss Aversion: Aggregate Patterns Versus Individual Choices. [REVIEW]Pavlo R. Blavatskyy & Ganna Pogrebna - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (1-2):159-171.
A Streetcar Named Belief: Folk Psychology in Theory and Practice.Steven Glenn Daniel - 1996 - Dissertation, Cornell University
The Asian Disease Problem and the Ethical Implications Of Prospect Theory.Sandra Dreisbach & Daniel Guevara - 2019 - Noûs 53 (3):613-638.
Stability of Risk Preferences and the Reflection Effect of Prospect Theory.Manel Baucells & Antonio Villasís - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (1-2):193-211.
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Extended Stakeholder Theory, and Empirical Test with Accounting Measures. [REVIEW]Gerwin Van der Laan, Hans Van Ees & Arjen Van Witteloostuijn - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 79 (3):299-310.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.D. Kahneman & A. Tversky - 1979 - Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:263--291.
New Paradoxes of Risky Decision Making.Michael H. Birnbaum - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (2):463-501.
A Dynamic, Stochastic, Computational Model of Preference Reversal Phenomena.Joseph G. Johnson & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (4):841-861.
The Nonadditivity of Personality Impressions.Michael H. Birnbaum - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):543.