Johan van Benthem, Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Frank Veltman (eds.), Logic and Argumentation

Argumentation 12 (4):508-512 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/a:1007716828252

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Editors' introduction.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):137-139.
In Memoriam Rob Grootendorst (1944–2000).Frans H. van Eemeren - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):3-6.
Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans et alia, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Background and Contemporary Developments. [REVIEW]Manfred Kienpointner - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (1):127-133.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob and Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca (2002).Claude Gratton - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):489-494.
Rules for argumentation in dialogues.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):499-510.
Considering pragma-dialectics: a festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday.F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Haft-van Rees & A. M. (eds.) - 2006 - Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Critical Notice of 'Controversy and Confrontation. Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory' by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen. [REVIEW]Maria Navarro - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (1):69-74.
Argumentation and speech act theory.FransH Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):341-343.
Considering pragma-dialectics: a festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday.F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Haft-van Rees & A. M. (eds.) - 2006 - Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Frans H. van Eemeren (ed.) (2001), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (3):355-359.
Which of the fallacies are fallacies of relevance?Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):237-250.
Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.) (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. [REVIEW]R. H. Johnson - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):483-488.
Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds): Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues. [REVIEW]Harry Weger - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):115-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
50 (#311,977)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references