- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology
Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (1):83-86 (1995)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Reviews : Michael Billig, Arguing and Thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989 (1987), paper £9.95, vi + 290 pp. [REVIEW]Mike Michael - 1991 - History of the Human Sciences 4 (3):441-444.
The Role of Rhetoric in a Dialogical Approach to Thinking.Antonia Larraín & Andrés Haye - 2012 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (2):220-237.
Rhetorical and historical aspects of attitudes: The case of the british monarchy.Michael Billig - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):83 – 103.
Ideological dilemmas: a social psychology of everyday thinking.Michael Billig (ed.) - 1988 - Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Critical thinking in social and psychological inquiry.Frank C. Richardson & Brent D. Slife - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (3):165-172.
Celebrating argument within psychology: Dialogue, negation, and feminist critique. [REVIEW]Michael Billig - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (1):49-61.
Intrinsic Versus Instrumental Values of Argumentation: The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation. [REVIEW]Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):453-474.
Gadamer's rhetorical conception of hermeneutics as the key to developing a critical hermeneutics.I. I. I. Mootz - unknown
Critical thinking and the end(s) of psychology.Suzanne R. Kirschner - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (3):173-183.
On the benefits of thinking unconsciously: Unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction.Ap Dijksterhuis & Zeger van Olden - 2006 - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42 (5):627-631.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-04
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2015-02-04
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism.John A. Lynch, Aaron J. Goldenberg, Kyle B. Brothers & Nanibaa' A. Garrison - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):51-63.
On the Universality of Argumentative Reasoning.Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 11 (1-2):85-113.
Death and Furniture: the rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism.Derek Edwards, Malcolm Ashmore & Jonathan Potter - 1995 - History of the Human Sciences 8 (2):25-49.
When discourse analysts tell stories: what do we ‘do’ when we use narrative as a resource to critically analyse discourse?Felicitas Macgilchrist - 2021 - Critical Discourse Studies 18 (3):387-403.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-9lpj8 uwo