The “scientific miracle of the qur’ān,” pseudoscience, and conspiracism

Zygon 52 (1):146-171 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article, after tracing a precise classification of the exegetical trend known as iʿjāz ʿilmī, summarizes and discusses the criticism leveled at it and examines how the “scientific interpretation” of the Qur’ān is liable to blend with pseudoscience and conspiracy theories to the detriment of a solid harmonization of science and religion and of a genuine appreciation of natural science. Furthermore, the article offers some practical ideas that can be implemented in order to effectively and fairly address iʿjāz ʿilmī in the Muslim world.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/zygo.12321

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Science, Pseudoscience, and Science Falsely So-CaIIed.Daniel P. Thurs & Ronald L. Numbers - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 121.
Should the No-Miracle Argument Add to Scientific Evidence?Wang-Yen Lee - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (4):999-1004.
The Social Psychology of “Pseudoscience”: A Brief History.Arthur Still & Windy Dryden - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (3):265-290.
Pseudoscience.Massimo Pigliucci - 2013 - In Byron Kaldis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. SAGE.
Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience?R. Paul Thompson - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.
Snakes from staves? Science, scriptures, and the supernatural in Maurice bucaille.Stefano Bigliardi - 2011 - Zygon 46 (4):793-805.
Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk: How to Tell the Difference.Peter Daempfle - 2012 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk: How to Tell the Difference.Peter Daempfle - 2012 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
The fuzziness of pseudoscience: Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry : Philosophy of pseudoscience: Reconsidering the demarcation problem. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013, vii+469, $105 HB, $35 PB.Robert Nola - 2014 - Metascience 24 (2):279-284.
Navigating the Landscape between Science and Religious Pseudoscience.Barbara Forrest - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 263.
The philosophy behind pseudoscience.Behind Pseudoscience - 2009 - In Kendrick Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus. pp. 235.
Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience.Paul R. Thagard - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:223 - 234.
Science and/or Miracle? The System Approach to Miracle Events.Adam Świeżyński - 2015 - Open Theology 1 (1):389-406.
Calling Science Pseudoscience: Fleck's Archaeologies of Fact and Latour's ‘Biography of an Investigation’ in AIDS Denialism and Homeopathy.Babette Babich - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (1):1-39.
Miracles with method.John B. Gill - 1977 - Sophia 16 (3):19 - 26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-13

Downloads
46 (#328,927)

6 months
10 (#213,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

View all 8 references / Add more references