In Response

Studies in Christian Ethics 28 (3):328-342 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author of In Defence of War responds to each commentator in turn, discussing the following issues, among others: the Christian specification of just war, its punitive form, the virtue of callousness, love for the enemy, the intention to kill, proportionality, empire, international law, human fatedness, and the First World War

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Heart of the Matter? The Callousness of Just War.Cian O’Driscoll - 2015 - Studies in Christian Ethics 28 (3):273-279.
Nigel Biggar’s Just War: Reflections on jus ad bellum.Cécile Fabre - 2015 - Studies in Christian Ethics 28 (3):292-297.
In Defence of War.Nigel Biggar - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
Nicholas Wolterstorff, Justice: Rights and Wrongs.Nigel Biggar - 2010 - Studies in Christian Ethics 23 (2):130-137.
Biggar’s Critique of Christian Pacifism, Extended.John Kelsay - 2015 - Studies in Christian Ethics 28 (3):259-265.
Response to "Pure Love" by Robert Merrihew Adams.John Giles Milhaven - 1980 - Journal of Religious Ethics 8 (1):101 - 104.
Love, Christian and Diverse: A Response to Colin Grant.Edward Collins Vacek - 1996 - Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (1):29-34.
How (not) to specify normal conditions for response-dependent concepts.Jussi Haukioja - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):325 – 331.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-06

Downloads
13 (#1,010,467)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references