On Definitions and Defining

Filozofia 65 (8):719-737 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper deals with some logical, semantic and methodological aspects of defining and definitions. First of all, basic features of the background semantic theory are specified. Next, three different kinds of definitions are distinguished: codifying definitions, objectual analytic definitions and meaning analytic definitions. It is shown that the relationships between the definiendum and the definiens in a given definition differ with respect to these different kinds of definition. Furthermore, it is argued that definitions and defining are intrinsically connected with so called conceptual systems. Finally, definitions are distinguished from explications

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defining Philosophical Counselling: An Overview1.D. Louw - 2013 - South African Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):60-70.
Trying to define art as the sum of the arts.Stephen Davies - 2008 - Pazhouhesh Nameh-E Farhangestan-E Honar (Research Journal of the Iranian Academy of the Arts) 8:12–23.
Why just (Necessary) Truths as Assumptions in Deductive Inferences?Frantisek Gaher & Lukas Bielik - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20:75-97.
What Were Tarski's Truth-Definitions for?John F. Fox - 1989 - History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (2):165-179.
Defining Rhetorical Argumentation.Christian Kock - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):437-464.
The Prospects of the Concept Match in Hyperintensional Deduction.Lukas Bielik & Frantisek Gaher - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20:98-111.
Využitie pojmu zhoda v hyperintenzionálnej dedukcii.Lukáš Bielik & František Gahér - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (2):98-111.
Prečo len (nutné) pravdy ako predpoklady deduktívnych úsudkov?František Gahér & Lukáš Bielik - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (2):75-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-18

Downloads
1 (#1,886,728)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lukas Bielik
Comenius University
Marián Zouhar
Comenius University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references