Short-sightedness in Youth Welfare Provision: The Case of RSA in France

Intergenerational Justice Review 6 (1) (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper reconstitutes and addresses critically the deontological and consequentialist arguments given by the French government to justify the denial of the national guaranteed minimum income support to young people under 25 years old. The deontological arguments express a concern for distributive justice and suggest that young people do not deserve income support. The consequentialist arguments; on the other hand; emphasise social efficiency: they draw on the alleged negative outcomes that the extension of income support to young people would bring about. After analysing each argument; this paper concludes that the denial of RSA to young people is an illegitimate discrimination. It then proposes that we understand our duties towards young people through an account of prudence that reconciles both concerns of distributive justice with concerns for social efficiency and concerns for inter- and intragenerational justices.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liberal Egalitarianism and Workfare.Paul Bou-Habib & Serena Olsaretti - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3):257-270.
Mater Dolorosa: Negotiating Support in NSW Youth Justice Conferencing.Michele Zappavigna & J. R. Martin - 2014 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (2):263-275.
Say No to Jesus![author unknown] - 1996 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 28 (1):5-6.


Added to PP

12 (#1,090,954)

6 months
2 (#1,206,262)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?