Critical principles: on the negative side

New Ideas in Psychology 20:1-34 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

neglected aspect: knowledge of error, or ‘‘negative’’ knowledge. The development of knowledge of what counts as error occurs via a kind of internal variation and selection, or quasi-evolutionary, process. Processes of reflection generate a hierarchy of principles of error.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vagueness and Margin for error principles.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):107-125.
Williamson on inexact knowledge.Anna Mahtani - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (2):171 - 180.
On the Reliability of Science: The Critical Rationalist Version.Joseph Agassi - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (1):100-115.
Knowing how to establish intellectualism.Daniele Sgaravatti & Elia Zardini - 2008 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):217-261.
Schelling's Late Negative Philosophy: Crisis and Critique of Pure Reason.Marcela García - 2011 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 3 (2):141-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
33 (#473,861)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Bickhard
Lehigh University

References found in this work

Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong.Jerry A. Fodor - 1998 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of natural science.Carl Gustav Hempel - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Philosophy of Natural Science.Carl G. Hempel - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):70-72.
Teleology and the logical structure of function statements.William C. Wimsatt - 1972 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 3 (1):1-80.

View all 12 references / Add more references