Sex, Dementia, and Consent
Abstract
Sex and dementia is becoming an increasingly important topic in applied ethics. By the year 2030, more than 74.7 million people are expected to be diagnosed with dementia worldwide; many of these people may want to engage in sex. The question of how to manage cases of sex and dementia is occurring more frequently in practical cases because of our aging population. The primary reason that sex and dementia is ethically complex is because sexual consent is both legally and morally significant, yet many people with dementia may be unable to consent in accordance with current standards. In this dissertation, I introduce three frameworks that could be used to approach cases of sex and dementia. The first framework is that of relational autonomy and supported decision-making; this framework tries to enable people with dementia to make autonomous sexual decisions with support. The next approach is a framework of advance sexual consent, which considers the relevance of prior autonomous sexual decisions. The third framework focuses on prioritizing well-being above a person’s capacity to make autonomous decisions and to consent to sex. I assess each framework and consider their positive and negative nuances. The overall goal is to balance the right to sexuality while at the same time protecting people with dementia from undue harm. Ultimately, this dissertation shows that cases of sex and dementia ought to be managed on a case-by-case basis; one framework will not work for every context. In order to approach situations on a case-by-case basis, I contend that a process of weighing and balancing norms and principles is necessary. I use Beauchamp and Childress’s method of weighing and balancing to propose a systematic procedure. This process takes various factors into account in order to determine how to proceed in an ethically defensible manner. According to an approach of weighing and balancing, sexual acts would not be immediately barred based on a person’s inability to consent; rather, a person’s present convictions, the sexual activity to which they want to participate, the possibility of experiencing undue harm, their prior wishes and values, their capacity to make autonomous decisions with support, etc. would all be considered. Overall, this dissertation contributes to the complex topic of sex and dementia and offers a starting point for further discussion on how to approach these cases in practice.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Dementia, sexuality and consent in residential aged care facilities.Laura Tarzia, Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh & Michael Bauer - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):609-613.
Beyond competence: advance directives in dementia research.Karin Roland Jongsma & Suzanne van de Vathorst - 2015 - Monash Bioethics Review 33 (2-3):167-180.
Ethical and Methodological Issues in Interviewing Persons With Dementia.Ingrid Hellström, Mike Nolan, Lennart Nordenfelt & Ulla Lundh - 2007 - Nursing Ethics 14 (5):608-619.
Participation in dementia research: rates and correlates of capacity to give informed consent.J. Warner, R. McCarney, M. Griffin, K. Hill & P. Fisher - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):167-170.
Living to the bitter end? A personalist approach to euthanasia in persons with severe dementia.Jan de Lepeleire & Chris Gastmans - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (2):78-86.
Living to the bitter end? A personalist approach to euthanasia in persons with severe dementia.Chris Gastmans & Jan de Lepeleire - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (2):78-86.
Advance directives for non-therapeutic dementia research: some ethical and policy considerations.R. L. Berghmans - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (1):32-37.
Advance directives in dementia research: The opinions and arguments of clinical researchers − an empirical study.Karin Jongsma & Suzanne van de Vathorst - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (1):4-14.
Self and embodiment: a bio-phenomenological approach to dementia.Stephan Millett - 2011 - Dementia 10 (4):509-522.
Living to the bitter end? A personalist approach to euthanasia in persons with severe dementia.Jan Lepeleire Chris Gastmandes - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (2):78-86.
Living to the bitter end? A personalist approach to euthanasia in persons with severe dementia.Jan De Lepeleire Chris Gastmans - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (2):78-86.
A Review of Contemporary Work on the Ethics of Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for People with Dementia.Peter Novitzky, Alan F. Smeaton, Cynthia Chen, Kate Irving, Tim Jacquemard, Fiachra O’Brolcháin, Dónal O’Mathúna & Bert Gordijn - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (3):707-765.
Including People with Dementia in Research: An Analysis of Australian Ethical and Legal Rules and Recommendations for Reform.Nola M. Ries, Katie A. Thompson & Michael Lowe - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (3):359-374.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-08-04
Downloads
17 (#640,741)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
2018-08-04
Downloads
17 (#640,741)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
Historical graph of downloads