Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (4):817-836 (2017)

Pre-college philosophy has proliferated greatly over the last few decades, including in the form of ‘philosophy across the curriculum’. However, there has been very little sustained examination of the nature of philosophy as a subject relative to other standard pre-college subjects and the kinds of expertise an effective philosophy teacher at this level should possess. At face value, the minimal academic preparation expected for competence in secondary philosophy instruction, compared to the high standards for teaching other subjects, raises questions and concerns. In this paper I make some provisional observations about the subject of philosophy and how it is taught from p4c through to the post-secondary level. I begin by examining the concept of ‘philosophy across the curriculum’ and offer a working analysis of the main features of philosophy's form and content that enable us to determine its relevance to, and difference from, other subjects. Next, I examine and critique what I term the ‘populist’ conception of philosophy, which correlates to lower expectations of teacher training, and use my own experience of teaching philosophy across the curriculum to shed doubt on the viability of this approach. In the third section I consider what I term the ‘autonomous’ conception of philosophy, which correlates to more stringent expectations of teacher capacity, and explain why it is preferable to the populist conception with some qualifications. I conclude by reflecting on how philosophy compares to other subjects that are advanced cross-curricularly and argue for more training of high school philosophy teachers.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9752.12258
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy and the Young Child.Gareth B. Matthews - 1979 - Metaphilosophy 10 (3-4):354-368.
Philosophy and Other Disciplines.Sven Ove Hansson - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):472-483.
Philosophy and the Young Child.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1982 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (2):265-267.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophy for Children and Other People.William J. Rapaport - 1987 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy (Summer):19-22.
High School Juniors, Philosophy, and a Confused Teacher.[author unknown] - 2005 - Questions 5:10-10.
Socrates in Homeroom.James R. Davis - 2013 - Teaching Philosophy 36 (3):217-238.


Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #296,785 of 2,499,202 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,670 of 2,499,202 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes