That F is G: Defending Quantification

Dissertation, University of Connecticut (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation is about the meaning of phrases like "That man" or "This bag". These phrases are described as Complex Demonstratives. There is a difference of opinion regarding whether these phrases are directly referential or quantificational. I have weighed the arguments regarding this debate in the dissertation. I have concluded that there are cogent arguments to believe that such phrases are quantificational. However, one cannot retain the insights of the directly referential account inside the quantificational account. That is a creditable move, but the move abandons a crucial property of quantifiers: permutation invariance. Since that is the case, I have suggested that given the evidence at hand, and the examination of the evidence in the dissertation, we may settle for a simpler theory that does not accommodate the intuitions of the direct referentialist. Those intuitions have to be accounted for through the intentions of a speaker when she utters phrases using complex demonstratives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein's Theory of Quantification.T. F. Baxley - 1980 - International Logic Review 21:46.
On What There Are.Philippe De Rouilhan - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102:183 - 200.
On what there are.Philippe de Rouilhan - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (2):183–200.
Indenumerability and substitutional quantification.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1982 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (4):358-366.
‘That’-Clauses and Non-nominal Quantification.Tobias Rosefeldt - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (3):301 - 333.
Unrestricted Quantification.Salvatore Florio - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (7):441-454.
Truth via Sentential Quantification.Mark Textor - 2005 - Dialogue 44 (3):539-550.
Quantification in Natural Languages.Emmon W. Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara H. Partee (eds.) - 1995 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Interpreting quantification.Ruth Barcan Marcus - 1962 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):252 – 259.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-19

Downloads
22 (#669,532)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nilanjan Bhowmick
University of Delhi

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references