Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (2):319-333 (2021)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Views which deny that there are necessary connections between distinct existences have often been criticized for leading to inductive skepticism. If there is no glue holding the world together then there seems to be no basis on which to infer from past to future. However, deniers of necessary connections have typically been unconcerned. After all, they say, everyone has a problem with induction. But, if we look at the connection between induction and explanation, we can develop the problem of induction in a way that hits deniers of necessary connections, but not their opponents. The denier of necessary connections faces an `internal' problem with induction -- skepticism about important inductive inferences naturally flows from their position in a way that it doesn't for those who accept necessary connections. This is a major problem, perhaps a fatal one, for the denial of necessary connections.
|
Keywords | Induction Explanation Laws of Nature Humeanism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1080/00048402.2020.1793788 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Explanation and Scientific Understanding.Michael Friedman - 1974 - Journal of Philosophy 71 (1):5-19.
View all 29 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Natural Properties, Necessary Connections, and the Problem of Induction.Tyler Hildebrand - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96:668-689.
Is the Humean Defeated by Induction? A Reply to Smart.Eduardo Castro - 2016 - Philosophia 44 (2):435-446.
The Metaphysical Requirement for Models of Prediction and Explanationist Approaches to the Problem of Induction.Jaeho Lee - 2017 - Axiomathes 27 (3):225-242.
Falsificationism and the Pragmatic Problem of Induction.Danny Frederick - 2020 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 27 (4):494-503.
An Essentialist Perspective on the Problem of Induction.Brian Ellis - 1998 - Principia 2 (1):103-124.
Fool Me Once: Can Indifference Vindicate Induction?Zach Barnett & Han Li - 2018 - Episteme 15 (2):202-208.
Induction and Natural Kinds Revisited.Howard Sankey - 2021 - In Benjamin Hill, Henrik Lagerlund & Stathis Psillos (eds.), Reconsidering Causal Powers: Historical and Conceptual Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 284-299.
The Old Problem of Induction and the New Reflective Equilibrium.Jared Bates - 2005 - Dialectica 59 (3):347–356.
Is the Humean Defeated by Induction?Benjamin T. H. Smart - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):319-332.
An Essentialist Perspective on the Problem of Induction.Brian Ellis - 1998 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 2 (1):103-124.
Induction and Inference to the Best Explanation.Ruth Weintraub - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):203-216.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-06-27
Total views
410 ( #23,482 of 2,498,184 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #9,062 of 2,498,184 )
2020-06-27
Total views
410 ( #23,482 of 2,498,184 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #9,062 of 2,498,184 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads