Sorry, Darwin: Chemistry Never Made the Transition to Biology

Science and Scientist (scienceandscientist.org/biology) and Darwin Under Siege (scienceandscientist.org/Darwin) (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The term biology is of Greek origin meaning the study of life. On the other hand, chemistry is the science of matter, which deals with matter and its properties, structure, composition, behavior, reactions, interactions and the changes it undergoes. The theory of abiogenesis maintains that chemistry made a transition to biology in a primordial soup. To keep the naturalistic ‘inanimate molecules to human life’ evolution ideology intact, scientists must assemble billions of links to bridge the gap between the inanimate chemicals that existed in the primordial soup and anatomically modern humans. Even though the proponents of a natural origin of life expressed much optimism for providing their theories, presently there is a detailed compilation of information seriously questioning this doctrine. This reductionistic ideology has always failed to answer two simple questions: (1) What is the minimum number of parts that are essential for a living organism to survive? (2) By what mechanism do these parts get assembled together? Evolutionists say a series of prebiotic processes and developments guide networks of dynamically linked small molecules and amphiphiles to form biological macromolecules, membraneous compartments, and finally primitive cells. However, none of these proposed pathways to life appears to be credible. The continuous advancement in various fields of science are not only providing major challenges to reductionistic ideology but are supplying increasing evidence for a systemic concept of life as an organic whole. Several leading researchers in the field of ‘origin of life’ are continually concluding that there are major scientific problems attached with all existing naturalistic ‘origin of life’ hypothesis. Only by taking into account all biological activities collectively as a system can a satisfactory elucidation of the living state be realized. In this present paper an attempt has been made to present a few significant challenges to the theory of abiogenesis based on the peer reviewed scientific literature. Subsequently, a non-reductionistic concept of life as a system is proposed as an alternative for resolving some of the problems inherent in origin of life research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Paradigms of Biology.Marcello Barbieri - 2013 - Biosemiotics 6 (1):33-59.
What is life?: how chemistry becomes biology.Addy Pross - 2012 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
An interpretive review of the origin of life research.David Penny - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):633-671.
On the Meaning of Chance in Biology.James A. Coffman - 2014 - Biosemiotics 7 (3):377-388.
Two approaches to the study of the origin of life.R. Hengeveld - 2007 - Acta Biotheoretica 55 (2):97-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-04

Downloads
35 (#395,891)

6 months
5 (#246,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ph. D. Shanta, Ph.D.
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute Of Spiritual Culture And Science

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references