Is verbal communication a purely preservative process?

Philosophical Review 107 (2):261-288 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper titled “Content Preservation”, Tyler Burge argues that certain psychological processes play a purely preservative role, and not a justificatory role. Burge’s claim is that the justificatory force of the beliefs sustained by these processes is independent of features of these processes, such as their reliability. The function of these psychological processes is merely to preserve the beliefs in order to “assure the proper working of other cognitive capacities over time”. In particular, Burge claims that the memory processes underlying deductive reasoning and the psychological processes underlying verbal communication are purely preservative.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
73 (#221,697)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anne Louise Bezuidenhout
University of South Carolina

Citations of this work

Experts: Which ones should you trust?Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):85-110.
Is there a priori knowledge by testimony?Anna-Sara Malmgren - 2006 - Philosophical Review 115 (2):199-241.
Does linguistic communication rest on inference?François Recanati - 2002 - Mind and Language 17 (1-2):105–126.
Group testimony.Deborah Tollefsen - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (3):299 – 311.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references