Descartes' "I am a thing that thinks" versus Kant's "I think"

In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press (2008)

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
4 (#1,287,195)

6 months
1 (#388,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Descartes on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities.C. P. Ragland - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):377-394.
Kant's "I Think" Versus Descartes' "I Am a Thing That Thinks".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 9--31.
Divine Activity and Motive Power in Descartes's Physics.Andrew R. Platt - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):623 - 646.
Descartes' Dualism: Correcting Some Misconceptions.Andrea Christofidou - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):215-238.
Cartesian Realism and G/P-Implosion.Mark Glouberman - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:307-329.
Defending the Bounds of Cognition.Fred Adams & Ken Aizawa - 2010 - In Richard Menary (ed.), The Extended Mind. MIT Press. pp. 67--80.