Validation and Equifinality

In Claus Beisbart & Nicole J. Saam (eds.), Computer Simulation Validation: Fundamental Concepts, Methodological Frameworks, and Philosophical Perspectives. Springer Verlag. pp. 791-809 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, the concept of equifinalityEquifinality of model representations is discussed, from a background of model applications in the environmental sciences. Equifinality in this context is used to indicate that there may be many different model structures, parameterParameter sets and auxiliary conditions that might appear to give equivalent output predictions or acceptable fits to any observation data available for use in model calibration. This does not imply that the resulting ensembleEnsemble method of models will give similar predictions when used to predict the future under some changed conditions. As new information becomes available to allow model validation, this can be used to constrain the ensemble of modelsEnsemble of models within a Bayesian updating framework, although epistemic sources of uncertainty can make it difficult to define appropriate likelihood measures. It seems likely that the equifinality concept will persist into the future in the form of ensembles of model runs being used to estimate prediction uncertainties. However, more research is needed into the limitations of model structuresModel structure, information content of dataData sets subject to epistemic uncertainties and means of evaluating and validating models in the inexact sciences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dynamical Symmetries and Model Validation.Benjamin C. Jantzen - 2019 - In James Robert Brown, Shaoshi Chen, Robert M. Corless, Ernest Davis, Nicolas Fillion, Max Gunzburger, Benjamin C. Jantzen, Daniel Lichtblau, Yuri Matiyasevich, Robert H. C. Moir, Mark Wilson & James Woodward (eds.), Algorithms and Complexity in Mathematics, Epistemology, and Science: Proceedings of 2015 and 2016 Acmes Conferences. Springer New York. pp. 153-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
17 (#849,202)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Regimes of Evidence in Complexity Sciences.Fabrizio Li Vigni - 2021 - Perspectives on Science 29 (1):62-103.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references