Hypatia 21 (1):80-100 (2006)

Abstract
This paper engages with theories of the monstrous maternal in feminist philosophy to explore how examples of visual art practice by Susan Hiller, Marc Quinn, Alison Lapper, Tracey Emin, and Cindy Sherman disrupt maternal ideals in visual culture through differently imagined body schema. By examining instances of the pregnant body represented in relation to maternal subjectivity, disability, abortion, and “prosthetic” pregnancy, it asks whether the “monstrous” can offer different kinds of figurations of the maternal that acknowledge the agency and potential power of the pregnant subject.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb00966.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection.Julia Kristeva - 1982 - Columbia University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Against Abjection.Imogen Tyler - 2009 - Feminist Theory 10 (1):77-98.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pregnant Embodiment: Subjectivity and Alienation.Iris Marion Young - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (1):45-62.
Art and Imagination.Nick Wiltsher & Aaron Meskin - 2016 - In Amy Kind (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Imagination. London: Routledge. pp. 179–191.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
25 ( #460,465 of 2,533,648 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,648 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes