- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
When Limiting Liberty, Tread Carefully: Autonomous Free Choices Should Not Be Overruled Because of the Beliefs and Values of the Decider
American Journal of Bioethics 22 (10):70-72 (2022)
Abstract
Pickering, Newton-Howes, and Young argue that a person should be considered incapable of making a specific decision if that decision is judged by onlookers to be seriously harmful to the dec...My notes
Similar books and articles
The Self at Liberty: Political Argument and the Arts of a Government.Duncan Ivison - 1997 - Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
Free will is about choosing: The link between choice and the belief in free will.Gilad Feldman, Roy Baumeister & Kin Fai Wong - 2014 - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55:239-245.
Moralized Selves: Liberty and Self-Government in the Multicultural State.Steven Andrew Kelts - 2002 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Autonomy and the emotions.Christine Tappolet - 2006 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 2 (2):45-59.
Respecting Personal Autonomy in Bioethics: Relational Autonomy as a Corrective?James F. Childress - 2022 - In James F. Childress & Michael Quante (eds.), Thick Autonomy: Personal Autonomy in Ethics and Bioethics. Springer Verlag. pp. 135-149.
On the Foundations of Beliefs in Free Will: Intentional Binding and Unconscious Priming in Self-Agency.Henk Aarts & Kees van den Bos - 2011 - Psychological Science 22 (4):532-537.
Agency and Autonomy in Food Choice: Can We Really Vote with Our Forks?J. M. Dieterle - 2022 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 35 (1):1-15.
Public health and liberty: Beyond the millian paradigm.Bruce Jennings - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (2):123-134.
Respect for Personal Autonomy, Human Dignity, and the Problems of Self-Directedness and Botched Autonomy.Y. M. Barilan - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):496-515.
Giving Liberty Its Due, But No More: Trans Fats, Liberty, and Public Health.Dr James Wilson - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):34-36.
On value-laden science.Zina B. Ward - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 85:54-62.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-09-29
Downloads
2 (#1,432,310)
6 months
1 (#479,283)
2022-09-29
Downloads
2 (#1,432,310)
6 months
1 (#479,283)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (4):37.
Beneficence, Interests, and Wellbeing in Medicine: What It Means to Provide Benefit to Patients.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (3):53-62.
The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):9-19.
Harmful Choices, the Case of C, and Decision-Making Competence.Neil Pickering, GIles Newton-Howes & Greg Young - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (10):38-50.
Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.Giles Birchley - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):111-115.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b5888c749-fsgz8 N