Abstract
Those who naturalize semantics concentrate on avoiding difficulties in getting the right sort of cause for the biological item which is to possess semantic properties (to be ?true of or to be ?about? some physical item). Using an analogy with sense?data, I argue that the real difficulties will be trying to get any proposed neural representation to be the right sort of effect of natural processes. The idea of a biological item which can be a semantic ?primitive? is as bankrupt as the idea of a mental item which could be a perceptual ?primitive?. Eventually I propose a technique for finding naturalized representations without these problems
Keywords Causality  Epistemology  Naturalized Epistemology  Representation  Semantics  Sense Data
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201749108602258
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mind and Meaning.Brian Loar - 1981 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Naturalizing the Semantics of Mental Representation.Stuart Silvers - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (March):49-73.
Normative Epistemology and Naturalized Epistemology.Harold I. Brown - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):53 – 78.
A Critique of Connectionist Semantics.Jonathan A. Waskan - 2001 - Connection Science 13 (3):277-292.
Naturalizing Epistemology: Quine, Simon and the Prospects for Pragmatism.Stephen Stich - 1993 - In C. Hookway & D. Peterson (eds.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-17.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
44 ( #255,279 of 2,499,417 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,166 of 2,499,417 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes