Zašto 2+2=4?

Filozofska Istrazivanja 25 (4):945-961 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The starting point of this article is the ontological question: What makes it true that2+2=4?, that is, what are the truth makers of mathematical propositions? Of course,the satisfactory theory in the philosophy of mathematics has to answer semantical question: What are mathematical propositions about? Also, epistemological question:How do we know them?, as well. Author compares five theories in the philosophy of mathematics, that is, five accounts of the nature of truth makers in mathematical discourse: fictionalism ; nominalism ; physicalism ; conceptualism and Platonism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Zašto je živopisni gradić dobio aureolu svetosti?Esad Ćimić - 2010 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 30 (1-2):323-333.
Why 2+2=4?Boran Berčić - 2005 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 25 (4):945-961.
Fatalism.Boran Berčić - 2000 - Theoria 43 (3-4):25-63.
Skepticism.Boran Berčić - 2001 - Theoria 44 (1-4):7-94.
Utilitarizam.Boran Berčić - 2008 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 28 (2):363-377.
Utilitarianism.Boran Berčić - 2008 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 28 (2):363-377.
Smisao života.Boran Berčić - 2006 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 26 (1):91-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
13 (#950,112)

6 months
2 (#1,015,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Boran Berčić
University of Rijeka

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references