The Unfinished Business of Developing Standards for End-of-Life Care: Leveraging Quality Improvement and Peer Review

American Journal of Bioethics 15 (8):50-51 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quality of life is a process not an outcome.Leah McClimans & John P. Browne - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (4):279-292.
The Relation Between Concepts of Quality-of-Life, Health and Happiness.A. W. Musschenga - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (1):11-28.
Quality improvement projects and research review.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):394-394.
Quality in ethics consultations.Gerard Magill - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):761-774.
Delineating paternalism in pediatric care.John H. Sorenson & Garrett E. Bergman - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Quality end‐of‐life care.Kerry W. Bowman, Douglas K. Martin & Peter A. Singer - 2000 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (1):51-61.
Evidence for the effectiveness of Peer review.Robert H. Fletcher & Suzanne W. Fletcher - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):35-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-31

Downloads
24 (#637,523)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references