On de Finetti’s instrumentalist philosophy of probability

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (2):1-48 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

De Finetti is one of the founding fathers of the subjective school of probability. He held that probabilities are subjective, coherent degrees of expectation, and he argued that none of the objective interpretations of probability make sense. While his theory has been influential in science and philosophy, it has encountered various objections. I argue that these objections overlook central aspects of de Finetti’s philosophy of probability and are largely unfounded. I propose a new interpretation of de Finetti’s theory that highlights these aspects and explains how they are an integral part of de Finetti’s instrumentalist philosophy of probability. I conclude by drawing an analogy between misconceptions about de Finetti’s philosophy of probability and common misconceptions about instrumentalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On de Finetti’s instrumentalist philosophy of probability.Joseph Berkovitz - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (2):25.
Countable additivity and the de finetti lottery.Paul Bartha - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):301-321.
De Finetti was Right: Probability Does Not Exist.Robert F. Nau - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):89-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-20

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Berkovitz
University of Toronto, St. George

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):341-344.
The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Synthese 11 (1):86-89.
A nonpragmatic vindication of probabilism.James M. Joyce - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (4):575-603.
What conditional probability could not be.Alan Hájek - 2003 - Synthese 137 (3):273--323.

View all 49 references / Add more references