Marginally Represented Patients and the Moral Authority of Surrogates

American Journal of Bioethics 20 (3):W1-W2 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Volume 20, Issue 3, March 2020, Page W1-W2.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2020.1713248

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Marginally Represented Patients and the Moral Authority of Surrogates.Jeffrey T. Berger - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):44-48.
The Limits of Surrogates’ Moral Authority and Physician Professionalism: Can the Paradigm of Palliative Sedation Be Instructive?Jeffrey T. Berger - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (1):20-23.
Managing Conflicts between Physicians and Surrogates.Carol Bayley - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (1):24-26.
On Surrogates’ Moral Authority: A Reply to Berger.Ryan K. Hubbard & Jake Greenblum - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):64-66.
Marginally Represented Patients, Best Interests, and Ends-in-Themselves.Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):57-59.
Bolstering Surrogate Decision Making for Marginally Represented and Unrepresented Patients: One System’s Approach and Experience.Jordan Potter & Jason Lesandrini - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):62-64.
Decisional Humility and the Marginally Represented Patient.Barrie J. Huberman & Joseph J. Fins - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):51-53.
On Patient Well‐being and Professional Authority.Mildred Z. Solomon - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (1):26-27.
Addressing the Perceived Duality of Represented and Unrepresented Patients: Legal Findings in a Moral Context.Paul S. Mueller, Erin S. DeMartino & Beau P. Sperry - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):49-50.
The Gulf Between; Surrogate Choices Physician Instructions, and Informal Network Respones.Tom Koch - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (2):185.
From Solo Decision Maker to Multi-Stakeholder Process: A Defense and Recommendations.David Ozar, Joseph Vukov, Kit Rempala & Rohan Meda - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):53-55.
The Surrogate's Authority.Hilde Lindemann & James Lindemann Nelson - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):161-168.
Decisions and Authority.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (1):2-2.
Grief and End-of-life Surrogate Decision Making.Michael Cholbi - 2016 - In John K. Davis (ed.), Ethics at the End of Life: New Issues and Arguments. New York: Routledge. pp. 201-217.
Denial and Dyads: Patients Whose Surrogates and Physicians Are Unrealistically Optimistic.Jeffrey T. Berger & Dana Ribeiro Miller - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):29-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-28

Downloads
14 (#965,243)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Moral Intimacy, Authority, and Discretion.Ryan H. Nelson & Bryanna Moore - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):66-68.
Compassionate Care for the Unconscious and Incapacitated.Michael J. Young - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):55-57.
On Surrogates’ Moral Authority: A Reply to Berger.Ryan K. Hubbard & Jake Greenblum - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):64-66.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral Intimacy, Authority, and Discretion.Ryan H. Nelson & Bryanna Moore - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):66-68.
Compassionate Care for the Unconscious and Incapacitated.Michael J. Young - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):55-57.

Add more references