Lakatos one and Lakatos two: An appreciation
In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Reidel. pp. 39--54 (1976)
Abstract
When I was pondering what I should write about Lakatos in this article, I ran into what seemed an insuperable difficulty. On one hand I thought that part of my job should be to give a portrait of Lakatos' personal manner. This would be informative from the point of view of history of thought, as it would help people read his works with greater understanding. And it would be interesting, if I succeeded at all: everyone who knew Lakatos would agree that he was one of the most remarkable people they had met. On the other hand memorial essays tend to give portraits whic are all sweetness and light. But such a portrait of Lakatos would not b a portrait of Lakatos. Everyone has his dark and his light side; sometimes we see one, occasionalley the other. But in Lakatos both were simultaneously and brilliantly displayed at every instant.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Lakatos, Reason, and Rationality.Gabor Forrai - 2002 - In G. Kampis L. Kvasz & M. Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology, and the Man. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 73-83.
Brecht and Lukács as teachers of Feyerabend and Lakatos: the Feyerabend-Lakatos debate as scientific recapitulation of the Brecht- Lukács debate.Val Dusek - 1998 - History of the Human Sciences 11 (2):25-44.
Chocolate and Chess (Unlocking Lakatos). [REVIEW]John Kadvany - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (2):276-286.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend for and against method: Including Lakatos's lectures on scientific method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend correspondence. [REVIEW]Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend Correspondence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999, cloth US $34.00. ISBN: 0226467740.Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend & Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
The legacy of Lakatos: Reconceptualising the philosophy of mathematics.Paul Ernest - 1997 - Philosophia Mathematica 5 (2):116-134.
For and Against Method, including Lakatos' Lectures on Scientific Method, and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. By Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. [REVIEW]J. Preston - 2002 - The European Legacy 7 (2):258-258.
For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence.Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend & Matteo Motterlini - 1999 - University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos' modification of Popper's falsificationism.Mo Liu - 2005 - Dissertation, University of Edinburgh
An hungarian tragedy.Jerome R. Ravetz - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):413 – 422.
Lakatos' Criticisms of Popper.Donald Gillies - 2002 - In George Kampis, Ladislav Kvasz & Michael Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 13-22.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-27
Downloads
14 (#732,752)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
2014-01-27
Downloads
14 (#732,752)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Skepticism, the critical standpoint, and the origin of birds: a partial critique of Havstad and Smith (2019).John A. Pourtless Iv - 2022 - Biology and Philosophy 37 (6):1–19.
Problems and meaning today: What can we learn from Hattiangadi's failed attempt to explain them together?John Wettersten - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (4):487-536.
Searching for the holy in the ascent of Imre Lakatos.John Wettersten - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):84-150.
Popper, Refutation and 'Avoidance' of Refutation.Greg Bamford - 1989 - Dissertation, The University of Queensland