Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):254 – 273 (1970)
AbstractLaw and order ranks high among the values the State is thought to achieve. Civil disobedience is often condemned because it is held to threaten law and order. Several senses of 'order' are distinguished, which make clear why 'law' and 'order' are so often linked. It is then argued that the connection cannot always be made since the legal system may itself create disorder. Civil disobedience may contribute to greater order and a more stable legal system by helping to remove these causes of disorder. Thus, civil disobedience is sometimes justifiable in terms of its contribution to law and order.
Similar books and articles
Anarchism, Historical Illegitimacy and Civil Disobedience: Reflections on A. John Simmons’ ‘Disobedience and its Objects’.Susanne Sreedhar - 2010 - The Boston University Law Review 90 (4):1833-1846.
Rawls and Gandhi on civil disobedience.Vinit Haksar - 1976 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):151 – 192.
Judicial responses to civil disobedience: A comparative approach.Sophie Turenne - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):379-399.
Features of a paradigm case of civil disobedience.Kimberley Brownlee - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):337-351.
Is ecosabotage civil disobedience?Jennifer Welchman - 2001 - Philosophy and Geography 4 (1):97 – 107.
Civil Disobedience and Moral Law in Nineteenth-Century American Philosophy.Edward H. Madden - 1968 - Seattle, University of Washington Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Legal obligation and the duty of fair play.John Rawls - 1964 - In Sidney Hook (ed.), Law and Philosophy. New York University Press.