Introduction. The Evolutionary Approach to Ethics: From Animal Prosociality to Human Morality

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):3-22 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evolutionary research on the biological fitness of groups has recently given a prominent value to the role that prosocial behaviors play in favoring a successful adaptation to ecological niches. Such a focus marks a paradigm shift. Early views of evolution relied on the notion of natural selection as a largely competitive mechanism for the achievement of the highest amount of resources. Today, evolutionists from different schools think that collaborative attitudes are an irremovable ingredient of biological change over time. As a consequence, a number of researchers have been attracted by evolutionary studies of human behaviors. Some think that a continuity among prosocial attitudes of human beings and other social mammals can be detected, and that this fact has relevance for accounting for human morality. Others deny one or the other of these claims, or both. The papers in the present special issue address how these topics impact ethics and religion.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal morality: What is the debate about?Simon Fitzpatrick - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):1151-1183.
From Partiality to Impartiality.Caroline Meline - 2016 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 23 (2):82-92.
Paradox and tragedy in human morality.Pouwel Slurink - 1994 - International Political Science Review 15 (347):378.
The evolution of morality and religion.Donald M. Broom - 2003 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Is there an Evolutionary foundation for Human Morality?John Hare - 2004 - In Philip Clayton & Jeffrey Schloss (eds.), Evolution and Ethics: Human Morality in Biological and Religious Perspective. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.. pp. 187--203.
Re-framing the debate over animal morality.Simon Fitzpatrick - 2020 - EurSafe Newsletter 22 (1):3-6.
Human Evolution and Objective Morality.Loren Haarsma - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 181--201.
The biological roots of morality.Francisco J. Ayala - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (3):235-252.
Human Nature and Business Ethics.Joshua D. Margolis - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 4:129-133.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-25

Downloads
444 (#42,077)

6 months
128 (#26,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniele Bertini
University Of Rome 2, Tor Vergata

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Natural History of Human Morality.Michael Tomasello (ed.) - 2015 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Homo sacer.Giorgio Agamben - 1998 - Problemi 1.
Can Cumulative Selection Explain Adaptation?Bence Nanay - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1099-1112.
Animal suffering as a challenge to theistic theodicy.Andrea Aguti - 2017 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 78 (4-5):498-510.

View all 7 references / Add more references