Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):397-414 (2004)

This research examines the association between attitudes on cheating and cognitive moral development. In this research, we use Rest's (1979a) Defining Issues Test, the Attitudes on Honesty Scale (Authors) and Academic Integrity Index (Authors); the last two are adaptations of the DIT. A total of 220 students from three universities participated in the study (66 psychology majors and 154 business majors). The data indicate that 66.4 percent of the students reported that they cheated in high school, college, or both high school and college. Psychology majors scored higher than business majors on both the Defining Issues Test (Rest, 1979a) and the Attitudes on Honesty Scale (AHS, Authors). Using factor analysis, we found significant associations between students' ratings of the importance considerations present in the three cheating scenarios and their estimates of whether cheating would occur (i.e., the Academic Integrity Index). Finally, using logistic regression, we found that the scores on the Attitudes on Honesty Scale and Academic Integrity Index associate with the self-reported cheating behavior of college students.
Keywords academic honesty  academic integrity  cheating
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000025039.47788.c2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Auditors' Ability to Discern the Presence of Ethical Problems.Julia N. Karcher - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (10):1033 - 1050.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
97 ( #123,486 of 2,533,674 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,674 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes