Defending intentionalist accounts of self-deception

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):107-108 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This commentary defends intentionalist accounts of self-deception against Mele by arguing that: (1) viewing self-deception on the model of other-deception is not as paradoxical as Mele makes out; (2) the paradoxes are not entailed by the view that self-deception is intentional; and (3) there are two problems for Mele's theory that only an intentionalist theory can solve.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,698

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

105 (#166,920)

6 months
13 (#281,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jose Luis Bermudez
Texas A&M University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references