A system of axiomatic set theory—Part I

Journal of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):65-77 (1937)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Introduction. The system of axioms for set theory to be exhibited in this paper is a modification of the axiom system due to von Neumann. In particular it adopts the principal idea of von Neumann, that the elimination of the undefined notion of a property (“definite Eigenschaft”), which occurs in the original axiom system of Zermelo, can be accomplished in such a way as to make the resulting axiom system elementary, in the sense of being formalizable in the logical calculus of first order, which contains no other bound variables than individual variables and no accessory rule of inference (as, for instance, a scheme of complete induction).The purpose of modifying the von Neumann system is to remain nearer to the structure of the original Zermelo system and to utilize at the same time some of the set-theoretic concepts of the Schröder logic and of Principia mathematica which have become familiar to logicians. As will be seen, a considerable simplification results from this arrangement.The theory is not set up as a pure formalism, but rather in the usual manner of elementary axiom theory, where we have to deal with propositions which are understood to have a meaning, and where the reference to the domain of facts to be axiomatized is suggested by the names for the kinds of individuals and for the fundamental predicates.On the other hand, from the formulation of the axioms and the methods used in making inferences from them, it will be obvious that the theory can be formalized by means of the logical calculus of first order (“Prädikatenkalkul” or “engere Funktionenkalkül”) with the addition of the formalism of equality and the ι-symbol for “descriptions” (in the sense of Whitehead and Russell).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A system of axiomatic set theory—Part VI.Paul Bernays - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):65-79.
A system of axiomatic set theory - Part VII.Paul Bernays - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (2):81-96.
A system of axiomatic set theory—Part II.Paul Bernays - 1941 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 6 (1):1-17.
A system of axiomatic set theory: Part IV. general set theory.Paul Bernays - 1942 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):133-145.
Bernays Paul. A system of axiomatic set theory—Part VI.C. D. Firestone - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):220-221.
Bernays Paul. A system of axiomatic set theory — Part VII.J. R. Shoenfield - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (4):367-368.
A System of Axiomatic Set Theory.Paul Bernays - 1944 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 9 (3):74-75.
The completeness of systems and the behavioral repertoire.R. E. Lana - 1995 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 16 (4):391-403.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
87 (#191,018)

6 months
24 (#113,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Incompleteness Via Paradox and Completeness.Walter Dean - 2020 - Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (3):541-592.
The Road to Modern Logic—An Interpretation.José Ferreirós - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):441-484.
The empty set, the Singleton, and the ordered pair.Akihiro Kanamori - 2003 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (3):273-298.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Grundlagen der Mathematik I. Hilbert & Bernays - 1935 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 42 (2):12-14.

Add more references