Early Science and Medicine 20 (1):27-47 (2015)

Brad Berman
Portland State University
This paper offers an interpretation of Aristotle’s treatment of the homoeomerous, or like-parted, bodies. I argue that they are liable to be far more complexly structured than is commonly supposed. While Aristotelian homoeomers have no intrinsic macrostructural properties, they are, in an important class of cases, essentially marked by the presence and absence of microstructural ones. As I show, these microstructural properties allow Aristotle to neatly demarcate the non-elemental homoeomers from the elements. That demarcation, in turn, helps to clarify Aristotle’s conceptions of both homoeomery and what it is to be a bodily element. On Aristotle’s account, I argue, a homoeomerous body, as such, is divisible into at least one part that is the same specific kind as the whole. Elemental bodies are the limiting case. For Aristotle, an elemental body is only divisible into parts that are of the same specific kind as the whole.

Keywords Aristotle  element  homoeomer

Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15733823-00201p02
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problem of Mixture.Kit Fine - 1995 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3-4):266-369.
Aristotle on Pure and Simple Stuff.Tiberiu Popa - 2010 - Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science:29-61.
Interpreting Aristotle on Mixture: Problems About Elemental Composition From Philoponus to Cooper.Michael Weisberg - 2004 - Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 35 (4):681–706.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Third Genos in Plato's "Timaeus".Dana Roby Miller - 1995 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Aristotle, Dynamics and Proportionality.Andrew Gregory - 2001 - Early Science and Medicine 6 (1):1-21.
Aristotle.J. M. E. Moravcsik - 1967 - Garden City, N.Y., Anchor Books.
Aristotle's Anatomical Philosophy of Nature.Christopher E. Cosans - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (3):311-339.
Altruism in Aristotle's Ethics.Kelly Elizabeth Rogers - 1993 - Dissertation, Columbia University
What's Wrong with Megalopsychia?Alexander Sarch - 2008 - Philosophy 83 (2):231-253.


Added to PP index

Total views
70 ( #162,400 of 2,498,560 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #211,850 of 2,498,560 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes