An Exposition of Matthew 16:13–20

Interpretation 29 (3):283-288 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

THE PROCEDURE of this article sees the expository task as an organic movement through literary description and exegetical analysis to interpretation. Engagement in the task of interpreting the text theologically must be our primary task. There is a need for expository preaching, and as servants of the Word we are called to do nothing less than to become engaged with the Word of the Lord

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Exposition of Matthew 4:1–11.H. Balmer - 1975 - Interpretation 29 (1):57-62.
An Exposition of Matthew 4:12–23.T. Hartley Hall - 1975 - Interpretation 29 (1):63-67.
The Problematic of Preaching in the Third Millennium.Arthur Van Seters - 1991 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 45 (3):267-280.
The Expressive Power of Medieval Logic.Terry Parsons - 2013 - Vivarium 51 (1-4):511-521.
Jean-Luc Nancy’s Concept of Body.Juan Manuel Garrido - 2009 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):189-211.
Interpreting the Gospel of Matthew.E. Charles - 1975 - Interpretation 29 (1):3-12.
“The Foolishness of Preaching”.John B. Rogers - 1991 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 45 (3):241-252.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references