Artifice and witness : representation judgement and accountability within a non-transcendent framework

Abstract

This thesis considers the notion that it is the future which judges the present and that judgement is always guilty. In effect to understand modernity on its own terms one would have to inquire if we have any more right to affirm a given future than to deny one?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Abstract.Stan Van Hooft - 2001 - Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):135 – 149.
Kant: The audacity of judgement.Rocque Reynolds - 1999 - Res Publica 5 (1):67-82.
Studying judgement: General issues.Nigel Harvey - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (1):103 – 118.
Principle-Based Moral Judgement.Maike Albertzart - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):339-354.
The role of judgement.Michael Luntley - 2005 - Philosophical Explorations 8 (3):281 – 295.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-07

Downloads
20 (#744,405)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references