The Problem is not Mathematics, but Mathematicians: Plato and the Mathematicians Again

Philosophia Mathematica 20 (2):170-199 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue against a formidable interpretation of Plato’s Divided Line image according to which dianoetic correctly applies the same method as dialectic. The difference between the dianoetic and dialectic sections of the Line is not methodological, but ontological. I maintain that while this interpretation correctly identifies the mathematical method with dialectic, ( i.e. , the method of philosophy), it incorrectly identifies the mathematical method with dianoetic. Rather, Plato takes dianoetic to be a misapplication of the mathematical method by a subset of practicing mathematicians. Thus, Plato’s critique of dianoetic is a not a critique of mathematics, as such, but of mathematicians

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction: Hypotheses and Progress.C. McLarty - 2012 - Philosophia Mathematica 20 (2):135-142.
Plato as "Architect of Science".Leonid Zhmud - 1998 - Phronesis 43 (3):211-244.
Logic for Mathematicians.Alan G. Hamilton - 1978 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
The Reliability of Randomized Algorithms.D. Fallis - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):255-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-15

Downloads
152 (#84,751)

6 months
4 (#185,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh Benson
University of Oklahoma

Citations of this work

Dianoia Left and Right.S. Pollard - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (3):309-322.

Add more citations