Synthese 196 (11):4449-4467 (2019)

Nir Ben-Moshe
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Physicians frequently ask whether they should give patients what they want, usually when there are considerations pointing against doing so, such as medicine’s values and physicians’ obligations. It has been argued that the source of medicine’s values and physicians’ obligations lies in what has been dubbed “the internal morality of medicine”: medicine is a practice with an end and norms that are definitive of this practice and that determine what physicians ought to do qua physicians. In this paper, I defend the claim that medicine requires a morality that is internal to its practice, while rejecting the prevalent characterization of this morality and offering an alternative one. My approach to the internal morality of medicine is constructivist in nature: the norms of medicine are constructed by medical professionals, other professionals, and patients, given medicine’s end of “benefitting patients in need of prima facie medical treatment and care.” I make the case that patients should be involved in the construction of medicine’s morality not only because they have knowledge that is relevant to the internal morality of medicine—namely, their own values and preferences—but also because medicine is an inherently relational enterprise: in medicine the relationship between physician and patient is a constitutive component of the craft itself. The framework I propose provides an authoritative morality for medicine, while allowing for the incorporation, into that very morality, of qualified deference to patient values.
Keywords Philosophy of medicine  Values in medicine  Internal Morality  Constructivism  Physician-patient relationship  Patient involvement
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11229-017-1466-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Internal Morality of Medicine: An Evolutionary Perspective.Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):581 – 599.
Might There Be a Medical Conscience?Nir Ben-Moshe - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (7):835-841.
A Method in Search of a Purpose: The Internal Morality of Medicine.John D. Arras - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):643 – 662.
The Impossibility of a Morality Internal to Medicine.Robert M. Veatch - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):621 – 642.
Internal Morality of Medicine and Physician Autonomy.Stephen McAndrew - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (3):198-203.
Pellegrino, MacIntyre, and the Internal Morality of Clinical Medicine.Xavier Symons - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (3):243-251.
Internal and External Standards for Medical Morality.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):601 – 619.
Understanding the Trusted Doctor and Constructing a Theory of Bioethics.Rosamond Rhodes - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (6):493-504.


Added to PP index

Total views
368 ( #27,158 of 2,499,071 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #18,403 of 2,499,071 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes