How the World Is Measured Up in Size Experience

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):345-365 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I develop a Russellian representationalist account of size experience that draws importantly from contemporary vision science research on size perception. The core view is that size is experienced in ‘body-scaled’ units. So, an object might, say, be experienced as two eye-level units high. The view is sharpened in response to Thompson’s (forthcoming) Doubled Earth example. This example is presented by Thompson as part of an argument for a Fregean view of size experience. But I argue that the Russellian view I develop handles the Doubled Earth example in a natural and illuminating way, thereby avoiding the need to posit irreducible experiential ‘modes of presentation’. I also address a kind of neo-Fregean ‘reference-fixing’ view of size experience, that shares features with the Russellian view developed. I give reasons for favoring the latter. Finally, I argue that Peacocke’s claim that spatial experience is ‘unit free’ is not persuasive

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Perception of size.Aage Slomann - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):101 – 113.
Environmental ethics and size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
Neurological models of size scaling.Helen E. Ross - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425.
Colour constancy and Fregean representationalism.Boyd Millar - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (1):219-231.
Color.Eric M. Rubenstein - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
To normalize or not to normalize for overall size?Francisco Aboitiz - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):327-328.
Worldly indeterminacy: A rough guide.Nicholas J. J. Smith & Gideon Rosen - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):185 – 198.
What is the Subjectivity of Perceptual Experience?Bosuk Yoon - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:215-222.
Senses for senses.Brad Thompson - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):99 – 117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-12

Downloads
183 (#102,495)

6 months
8 (#241,888)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Bennett
Brown University

Citations of this work

Gombrich and the Duck-Rabbit.Robert Eamon Briscoe - 2015 - In Michael Beaney, Brendan Harrington & Dominic Shaw (eds.), Aspect Perception After Wittgenstein: Seeing-as and Novelty. New York: Routledge. pp. 49-88.
Seeing Shape: Shape Appearances and Shape Constancy.David J. Bennett - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):487-518.
The Phenomenal Representation of Size.Jonathan Brink Morgan - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (4):716-729.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Perception Of The Visual World.James J. Gibson - 1950 - Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
The Logic Of Perception.Irvin Rock - 1983 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
Which Properties Are Represented in Perception.Susanna Siegel - 2005 - In Tamar S. Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-503.

View all 21 references / Add more references