Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (3):307-314 (2018)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10506-018-9226-0 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning.Douglas Neil Walton & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1995 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.
Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1969 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: Notre Dame University Press.
View all 35 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Recent Developments in Legal Argumentation Theory: Dialectical Approaches to Legal Argumentation.Eveline T. Feteris - 1994 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 7 (2):133-153.
Argumentation From Reasonableness in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.Eveline Feteris - 2015 - In Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. Springer Verlag.
The Rational Reconstruction of Complex Forms of Legal Argumentation: Approaches From Artificial Intelligence and Law and Pragma-Dialectics. [REVIEW]Eveline T. Feteris - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):393-400.
Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999). [REVIEW]William Twining - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):223-229.
Christian Dahlman and Eveline Feteris .Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives. [REVIEW]Janice Schuetz - 2014 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 3 (2):219-223.
The Analysis and Evaluation of Legal Argumentation: Approaches From Legal Theory and Argumentation Theory.Eveline Feteris & Harm Klossterhuis - 2009 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29).
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
Introduction: Models for the Analysis of Legal Argumentation.Eveline Feteris - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):1-5.
Models for the Analysis of Legal Argumentation: Introduction.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):1-5.
Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives'.Eveline Feteris - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):235-239.
The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.
The Role of the Judge in Legal Proceedings: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis.Eveline T. Feteris - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (2):234-252.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-03-31
Total views
23 ( #490,408 of 2,499,676 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,206 of 2,499,676 )
2018-03-31
Total views
23 ( #490,408 of 2,499,676 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,206 of 2,499,676 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
