Annals of Science 56 (1):81-94 (1999)

The strong opposition of nineteenth-century French chemists to atomism is usually described as a national attitude due to the overarching influence of positivism in France. The explanation sounds plausible, at first glance. However, the idea that a philosophy of science acted as an obstacle to the advancement of science needs further investigation. What is meant exactly by a philosophical influence on a scientific community? In analysing the alleged influence of positivism on the chemists' community it is argued that the common connection established between philosophical views and scientific attitudes leads to a misunderstanding of both philosophy and scientific activity. This paper first stresses the misreading of Auguste Comte's works; then the misunderstanding of scientific debates about atomism in chemistry. Finally it suggests an alternative view: that the atomic debates generated a variety of positivisms
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2010
DOI 10.1080/000337999296544
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Chemists' Style of Thinking.Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent - 2009 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 32 (4):365-378.
Mendeleev’s Periodic Law and the 19th Century Debates on Atomism.Pieter Thyssen - forthcoming - In Martin Eisvogel & Klaus Ruthenberg (eds.), Wald, Positivism and Chemistry. Würzburg, Germany:

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

When Did Atoms Begin to Do Any Explanatory Work in Chemistry?Paul Needham - 2004 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (2 & 3):199 – 219.
The Ambiguity of Reduction.Eric R. Scerri - 2007 - Hyle 13 (2):67 - 81.
Paneth, Kant, and the Philosophy of Chemistry.Klaus Ruthenberg - 2009 - Foundations of Chemistry 11 (2):79-91.


Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #668,685 of 2,519,663 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,663 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes