Willingness to Share yet Maintain Influence: A Cross-Sectional Study on Attitudes in Sweden to the Use of Electronic Health Data
Public Health Ethics 14 (1):23-34 (2021)
AbstractWe have investigated attitudes towards the use of health data among the Swedish population by analyzing data from a survey answered by 1645 persons. Health data are potentially useful for a variety of purposes. Yet information about health remains sensitive. A balance therefore has to be struck between these opposing considerations in a number of contexts. The attitudes among those whose data is concerned will influence the perceived legitimacy of policies regulating health data use. We aimed to investigate what views are held by the general public, and what aspects matter for the willingness to let one’s data be used not only for one’s own care but also for other purposes. We found that while there is a broad willingness to let one’s data be used, the possibility to influence that use is considered important. The study also indicated that when respondents are required to balance different interests, priority is typically given to compulsory schemes ensuring that data are available where needed, rather than voluntary participation and data protection. The policy implications to be drawn from this are not self-evident, however, since the fact that a majority has a certain attitude does not by itself determine the most adequate policy.
Similar books and articles
Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers.Katherine K. Kim, Pamela Sankar, Machelle D. Wilson & Sarah C. Haynes - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):25.
From preferences to policies? Considerations when incorporating empirical ethics findings into research policymaking.Emily A. Largent & Stephanie R. Morain - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (6):378-379.
Control, trust and the sharing of health information: the limits of trust.Soren Holm, Thomas Birk Kristiansen & Thomas Ploug - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e35-e35.
Cross Sector Data Sharing: Necessity, Challenge, and Hope.Cason Schmit, Kathleen Kelly & Jennifer Bernstein - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (S2):83-86.
The Effects of Fraud on the Evaluation of Health Care.Paul Jesilow - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (3):239-245.
Big Bad Data: Law, Public Health, and Biomedical Databases.Sharona Hoffman & Andy Podgurski - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (s1):56-60.
“Giving something back”: a systematic review and ethical enquiry into public views on the use of patient data for research in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland.Jessica Stockdale, Jackie Cassell & Elizabeth Ford - 2019 - Wellcome Open Research 3 (6).
Ethical sharing of health data in online platforms- which values should be considered?Brígida Riso, Aaro Tupasela, Danya F. Vears, Heike Felzmann, Julian Cockbain, Michele Loi, Nana C. H. Kongsholm, Silvia Zullo & Vojin Rakic - 2017 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1):1-27.
Public Health Surveillance: Electronic Reporting as a Point of Reference.Jennifer Black, Rachel Hulkower, Walter Suarez, Shreya Patel & Brandon Elliott - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (S2):19-22.
“You cannot collect data using your own resources and put It on open access”: Perspectives from Africa about public health data‐sharing.Evelyn Anane‐Sarpong, Tenzin Wangmo, Claire Leonie Ward, Osman Sankoh, Marcel Tanner & Bernice Simone Elger - 2018 - Developing World Bioethics 18 (4):394-405.
Automated vehicles, big data and public health.David Shaw, Bernard Favrat & Bernice Elger - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (1):35-42.
Trust and privacy in the context of user-generated health data.Brandon Williams, Eliot Storer, Charles Lotterman, Rachel Conrad Bracken, Svetlana Borodina & Kirsten Ostherr - 2017 - Big Data and Society 4 (1).
Sharing genomic data from clinical testing with researchers: public survey of expectations of clinical genomic data management in Queensland, Australia.Miranda E. Vidgen, Sid Kaladharan, Eva Malacova, Cameron Hurst & Nicola Waddell - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-11.
Cross-Sectoral Big Data: The Application of an Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research.Graeme T. Laurie - 2019 - Asian Bioethics Review 11 (3):327-339.
Data Ethics in Epidemiology: Autonomy, Privacy, Confidentiality and Justice.Vijayaprasad Gopichandran & Varalakshmi Elango - 2018 - In Arima Mishra & Kalyani Subbiah (eds.), Ethics in Public Health Practice in India. Springer Singapore. pp. 121-137.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Trust and digital privacy in healthcare: a cross-sectional descriptive study of trust and attitudes towards uses of electronic health data among the general public in Sweden.Niels Lynøe, Gert Helgesson & Sara Belfrage - 2022 - BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1):1-8.
References found in this work
Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary.James Childress & Tom Beauchamp - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (11):9-12.
The ethics of big data: current and foreseeable issues in biomedical contexts.Brent Daniel Mittelstadt & Luciano Floridi - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):303–341.
In Defense of Broad Consent.Gert Helgesson - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):40-50.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics: Improve Privacy in Research by Eliminating Informed Consent? IOM Report Misses the Mark.Mark A. Rothstein - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (3):507-512.