V. seseman’s “pure knowledge” concept

HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 11 (1):190-207 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although the concept of “pure knowledge” is one of the most interesting and singular concepts in the philosophical work of Vasily Seseman, it can only be presented after a comprehensive analysis of the philosopher’s numerous works devoted to ontological, epistemological and logical problems. Seseman believes that the main philosophical trends at the beginning of the twentieth century, namely neo-Kantianism, intuitionism and phenomenology, could not present this concept, although they did try. According to the philosopher, the main reason for the inability of neo-Kantianism, intuitionism and phenomenology to start talking about pure knowledge is their inability to assert the essential difference between objective and non-objective knowledge. Sesemann pays special attention when substantiating his concept of “pure knowledge” to the difference between his approach and that of the founder of modern phenomenology. The philosopher points out that even Husserl, who concentrated attention on the specifics of inner experience, puts this specific, in the end, in dependence on the process of cognition and reflection, completely ignoring its ontological foundations. While pure knowledge, according to Seseman, is neither non-objective, nor objective knowledge, nor non-objective, nor objective being, it, in fact, is non-knowledge and non-being. It is precisely this understanding by the philosopher of this phenomenon that allows him to characterize pure knowledge as premiseless and limitless and, in general, as free from any ontological or epistemological determinations. However, on the other hand, Sesemann insists that the phenomenon of pure knowledge has the meaning of not just a regulatory idea, an infinitely distant ideal, but also a real constitutive meaning, as a principle that reveals and determines the human striving for knowledge as an interconnected and necessary process that ascends from the onto-gnoseological stage of non-objective knowledge to the epistemological, and then the logical stage of objective knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What's the point of knowing how?Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2019 - European Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):693-708.
The Crocean Concept of the Pure Concept.M. E. Moss - 1987 - Idealistic Studies 17 (1):39-52.
The Crocean Concept of the Pure Concept.M. E. Moss - 1987 - Idealistic Studies 17 (1):39-52.
Why do Individual Pure Possibilities Necessarily Exist?Amihud Gilead - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 75:99-108.
Kierkegaard on the Problems of Pure Irony.Brad Frazier - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (3):417 - 447.
The Regulative Role of the Ideas and Principles of Reason in Kant's Philosophy.Seied Masud Sief - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 1 (202):77-88.
The interpretation of "nothingness" by Hegel's Dialectic.Youhui Chen - 2001 - Philosophy and Culture 28 (6):514-530.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-02

Downloads
6 (#1,430,516)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vladimir Belov
People Friendship’s University Of Russia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations