The model theory of unitriangular groups

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 68 (3):225-261 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

he model theory of groups of unitriangular matrices over rings is studied. An important tool in these studies is a new notion of a quasiunitriangular group. The models of the theory of all unitriangular groups are algebraically characterized; it turns out that all they are quasiunitriangular groups. It is proved that if R and S are domains or commutative associative rings then two quasiunitriangular groups over R and S are isomorphic only if R and S are isomorphic or antiisomorphic. This algebraic result is new even for ordinary unitriangular groups. The groups elementarily equivalent to a single unitriangular group UTn are studied. If R is a skew field, they are of the form UTn, for some S ≡ R. In general, the situation is not so nice. Examples are constructed demonstrating that such a group need not be a unitriangular group over some ring; moreover, there are rings P and R such that UTn ≡ UTn, but UTn cannot be represented in the form UTn for S ≡ R. We also study the number of models in a power of the theory of a unitriangular group. In particular, we prove that, for any communicative associative ring R and any infinite power λ, I = I). We construct an associative ring such that I = 3 and I) = 2. We also study models of the theory of UTn in the case of categorical R

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

One-basedness and groups of the form G/G00.Davide Penazzi - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (7-8):743-758.
Some model theory of Abelian groups.Paul C. Eklof - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (2):335-342.
Space complexity of Abelian groups.Douglas Cenzer, Rodney G. Downey, Jeffrey B. Remmel & Zia Uddin - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (1):115-140.
Why aren’t we all hutterites?Richard Sosis - 2003 - Human Nature 14 (2):91-127.
The model theory of finitely generated finite-by-Abelian groups.Francis Oger - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1115-1124.
Hyperlinear and sofic groups: a brief guide.Vladimir G. Pestov - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (4):449-480.
What are groups?Katherine Ritchie - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (2):257-272.
Model companions of theories with an automorphism.Hirotaka Kikyo - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1215-1222.
Coset-minimal groups.Oleg Belegradek, Viktor Verbovskiy & Frank O. Wagner - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 121 (2-3):113-143.
The metaphysics of groups.Nikk Effingham - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (2):251-267.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
24 (#639,942)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A hierarchy of tree-automatic structures.Olivier Finkel & Stevo Todorčević - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):350-368.
Elementary Equivalence for Abelian-by-Finite and Nilpotent Groups.Francis Oger - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1471-1480.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Model theory of modules.Martin Ziegler - 1984 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 26 (2):149-213.
Classification Theory and the Number of Nonisomorphic Models.S. Shelah - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (3):694-696.
Small Stable Groups and Generics.Frank O. Wagner - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1026-1037.
The elementary theory of abelian groups.Paul C. Eklof - 1972 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 4 (2):115.

View all 11 references / Add more references