The "De Dicto/De Re" Distinction in Relation to Actions

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83:159 - 173 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Martin Bell; X*—The De Dicto/De Re Distinction in Relation to Actions, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 83, Issue 1, 1 June 1983, Pages 159–174

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stich againstde dicto‐de reambiguity.Dale Jacquette - 1989 - Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):223-230.
Contradictions, Objects, and Belief.Srećko Kovač - 2007 - In Jean-Yves Béziau & Alexandre Costa-Leite (eds.), Perspectives on Universal Logic. Monza: Polimetrica. pp. 417-434.
Names and the de re/de dicto distinction.James D. Carney - 1983 - Philosophia 12 (3-4):357-361.
Names and the 'de re — de dicto' distinction.G. W. Fitch - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 39 (1):25 - 34.
De Re and De Dicto Explanation of Action.Sean Crawford - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (4):783-798.
Are desires de dicto fetishistic?Jonas Olson - 2002 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):89 – 96.
Do actions occur inside the body?Helen Steward - 2000 - Mind and Society 1 (2):107-125.
ModelTtheory for Modal Logic. Part I — The de re/de Dicto distinction.Kit Fine - 1978 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):125 - 156.
De dicto desires and morality as fetish.Vanessa Carbonell - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):459-477.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
22 (#669,532)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references