Patients, doctors and experimentation: doubts about the Declaration of Helsinki

Journal of Medical Ethics 4 (4):182-185 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki offers guidelines to doctors engaged in biomedical research with human subjects. The fundamental distinction of the Declaration is between clinical research combined with professional care and non-clinical scientific research. If hospital patients are the experimental subjects, then the former research must be carried out by the patient's own doctor, whereas the latter research must not be; it must be carried out by other doctors. The relevance of the distinction between the patient's own doctor and other doctors is challenged and an alternative conception of the patient-doctor relationship is drawn, together with an alternative justification, based on the work of Hans Jonas, of the use of patients in research. Finally, the political nature of the patient-doctor relationship is mentioned, and it is claimed that the alternative conception of this relationship developed in the paper is more in line with the ethical principles of the Hippocratic tradition

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,569

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

After Helsinki: Unresolved Issues in International Research.Ruth Macklin - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):17-36.
Placebo and the Helsinki Declaration — What to Do?Bozidar Vrhovac - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):81-93.
The Helsinki Declaration: Why All the Fuss?W. Tadd - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (5):439-450.
The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki: Some Reflections.S. Giordano - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (10):598-603.
Conscientious Refusal and a Doctors's Right to Quit.John K. Davis - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):75 – 91.
The Protection of Patients' Rights in Clinical Trials.Marek Czarkowski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.
Neonatal Pain Relief and the Helsinki Declaration.Robert S. Van Howe & J. Steven Svoboda - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):803-823.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
26 (#443,638)

6 months
1 (#418,511)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophy of Medicine in the United Kingdom.David Lamb & Susan M. Easton - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (1):3-34.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references