Frege’s Theory of Judgment
Philosophical Quarterly 30 (120):254-255 (1980)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Freges Erläuterung des Urteils.Wolfgang Becker - 1989 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 20 (2):230-248.
‘Thereby We Have Broken with the Old Logical Dualism’ – Reinach on Negative Judgement and Negation.Mark Textor - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (3):570 - 590.
Frege's Theory of Judgement. [REVIEW]Thomas G. Ricketts - 1984 - Philosophical Review 93 (2):313-315.
Frege's Judgement Stroke and the Conception of Logic as the Study of Inference not Consequence.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (4):639-665.
Review: David Bell, Frege's Theory of Judgement. [REVIEW]Howard Jackson - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (1):254-258.
Frege's Theory of Sense and Reference: Its Origin and Scope.Wolfgang Carl - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.
Truth, Value, and Truth Value. Frege's Theory of Judgement and its Historical Background.Gottfried Gabriel - 2013 - In Mark Textor (ed.), Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. New York: Palgrave. pp. 36-51.
The judgement-stroke as a truth-operator: A new interpretation of the logical form of sentences in Frege's scientific language.D. Greimann - 2000 - Erkenntnis 52 (2):213-238.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-20
Downloads
3 (#1,315,623)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2017-02-20
Downloads
3 (#1,315,623)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Rule‐Following and Rule‐Breaking: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein.Daniel Watts - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy (4):1159-1185.
Defusing eliminative materialism: Reference and revision.Maurice K. D. Schouten & Huib Looren de Jong - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (4):489-509.
Gedanken beleuchten. Frege und Davidson zum Problem der Prädikation.Christoph C. Pfisterer - 2009 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 57 (4):583-595.
