Design flaws

The Philosophers' Magazine 54:80-84 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Popular religions are practical; they are used as guides to living. But philosophical religion has no implications for how we should live. Hume thought that philosophical theism and popular monotheism cannot be coherently united. Yet incoherent unification is precisely what has happened in our own culture.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

1354814X

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Design flaws.Martin Bell - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 54 (54):80-84.
Refuting The Whole System? Hume's Attack on Popular Religion in The Natural History of Religion.Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):715-736.
Structural flaws: Massive modularity and the argument from design.Armin Schulz - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):733-743.
Meta-Argumentation in Hume’s Critique of the Design Argument.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - unknown
Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties.Aaron Smuts - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):34-53.
Two arguments against realism.Timothy Bays - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):193–213.
Fine‐Tuning, Multiple Universes and Theism.Rodney D. Holder - 2002 - Noûs 36 (2):295–312.
How not to attack intelligent design creationism: Philosophical misconceptions about methodological naturalism. [REVIEW]Maarten Boudry, Stefaan Blancke & Johan Braeckman - 2010 - Foundations of Science 15 (3):227-244.
Review : 'God and Design', ed. by N. Manson. [REVIEW]Graham Oppy - 2004 - Sophia 43 (1):127-31.
Engineering perspectives and technology design in the United States.Harold Salzman - 1991 - AI and Society 5 (4):339-356.
Do Moral Flaws Enhance Amusement?Aaron Smuts - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):151-163.
Where the Design Argument Goes Wrong: Auxiliary Assumptions and Unification.Maarten Boudry & Bert Leuridan - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (4):558-578.
An undignified bioethics: There is no method in this madness.Inmaculada de Melo-martín - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (4):224-230.
Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population.Roger Coleman, Simeon Keates & Cherie Lebbon - 2003 - Springer Verlag.
The Design of Material, Organism, and Minds: Different Understandings of Design.Michael Hampe & Silke Lang (eds.) - 2009 - Springer.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
14 (#965,243)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Bell
University of York

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references